- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2021 11:07 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2021 11:49 PM - edited 11-14-2021 11:50 PM
Normally, the executor has the billing name changed to the estate of the the deceased and the billing address to that of the executor and then terminate the the service.
If the executor is using the service for their own benefit, and charging the estate for the cost then the estate beneficiaries should be asking for an explanation and for the estate to be reimbursed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2021 03:05 PM
Not only it is legal for the executor to refuse to put their name on the bill, it would be expected! All property and contracts should be in the name of: "The Estate of [the deceased]" but since clearly the deceased cannot use telecommunications services, the biggest question is why the services have not been discontinued, and placed into name of the current consumer.
If you find a post useful, please give the author a "Kudo"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2021 08:57 PM
In the case of an unsold property in the estate where it is remotely monitored, it can be. "The estate" can use services....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2021 02:30 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-14-2021 11:49 PM - edited 11-14-2021 11:50 PM
Normally, the executor has the billing name changed to the estate of the the deceased and the billing address to that of the executor and then terminate the the service.
If the executor is using the service for their own benefit, and charging the estate for the cost then the estate beneficiaries should be asking for an explanation and for the estate to be reimbursed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2021
02:33 AM
- last edited on
11-17-2021
11:47 AM
by
T-Speed
Hi BC3,
rc (Rockstar) posted a new reply in My Home Account on 11-14-2021 08:49 PM:
Re: Deceased payees
Normally, the executor has the billing name changed to the estate of the the deceased and the billing add to that of the executor and then terminate the the service.
If the executor is using the service for their own benefit, and charging the estate for the cost then the estate beneficiaries should be asking for an explanation and for the estate to be reimbursed.
Reply | Accept as Solution | Give Kudos
TELUS Neighbourhood sent this message to ***.
You are receiving this email because a new message matches your subscription to a topic.
To control which emails we send you please go to, manage your subscription & notification settings or unsubscribe.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-16-2021 10:53 AM
If the service has a cancelation fee then the executor may be able to justify not changing the name, but if they are using the service for their personal use then they should reimburse the estate.
